Friday, October 14, 2011

Birthday Star

Today is my Birthday! So I thought I would write a birthday themed ADYK. I came across this cute website that finds your birthday star. The link is here. Now I didn't check it's scientific accuracy, but regardless it's a neat application. All you have to do is tell the program your birthday (month, day and year), and it will give you the name, coordinates and some information about a star whose distance in light years is close to your current age. Remember a light year is the distance light can travel in one year. So if a star is ten light years away, the light that you see tonight is actually ten years old. It's the light that star emitted 10 years ago, and it took that long to reach us here on Earth. So what's special about this birthday star? Well if the star is as far away in light years as your current age, then the light you are seeing from that star today was emitted on the exact day you were born! It's almost like looking back in time at what the universe looked like on the day of your birth. Below is my birthday star for today. Try it out, it's pretty cool!


Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Solar Neutrino Problem

Not understanding the actions of neutrinos seems to be a common theme for scientists. As discussed in last weeks ADYK, claims that neutrinos travel faster than the speed of light are currently stumping scientific theory, but neutrinos have always been mysterious particles...  


We discussed last week that neutrinos are neutral subatomic particles that are created in large quantities inside the sun. Astronomers in the 1940's hypothesized this, and decided to build detectors on Earth that would measure the amount of incoming solar neutrinos here on Earth. Based on the then current theories of solar fusion, astronomers predicted how many neutrinos they would expect to see in their detectors. Long story short, they measured only one third of the expected number of neutrinos, and the solar neutrino problem was born. Astronomers spent the next 50+ years trying to figure out where their theories went wrong. It was originally thought that neutrinos were massless particles, like light, and therefore existed in one form only. This turned out to be the problem, as was hypothesized by particle physicists in the 1960's and 1970's. If neutrinos had a tiny bit of mass, then quantum theory says that they have the ability to switch between three different "flavors" of neutrinos (electron, muon, tau), each with slightly different properties. If this were true, electron neutrinos would be created and released by the sun, then on their travels towards Earth, probability suggests that 33% would switch to tau neutrinos, and 33% would switch to the muon neutrinos. The detectors in the 1940's were only sensitive to electron neutrinos, and thus never detected the other two types (aka the other 66% of the missing neutrinos!). This sounded like a fantastic solution, but astronomers and physicist had to wait until the years 1962 and 2000 for the first detection of the muon and tau neutrino, respectively, thus confirming the theory. It was a long wait, but proving that neutrinos come in three flavors allowed scientists to refine the standard model of particle physics, and astronomers to really understand what was happening in the interior of stars.


Friday, October 7, 2011

Spaghettification!


Earlier this week, a second grader asked me what would happen if an astronaut fell into a black hole. "Well, what do you think might happen?" I responded back. Another anxious second grader waved his hand high. "You would get stretched out like a noodle!" he said. Very good! These second graders know more about black holes than I thought! If an astronaut were to fall into a black hole, the gravity at the persons feet would be stronger than at their head, effectively stretching their bodies as thin as spaghetti. So guess what astronomers call that effect…. Spaghettification! No joke!

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Black Holes Don't Suck!

I'm sure you've heard of a black hole before (If you've been reading ADYK you definitely have!) But what technically is a black hole? What is it made of? What does it do? Astronomers are still a bit uncertain about all of this, but here's what we think…

 
A black hole is defined as a singularity in space. This means that it is a point in space that is infinitely small and has infinite density. It's hard to think of an object like this in real life; one that can continually gain matter but stays extremely small. Most people have the impression that black holes "suck" in all the material around them. While black holes do attract matter, they are not like vacuums in outer space. Black holes warp the space time around them into giant funnels (like the cartoon above). This causes material to orbit black holes and fall towards the center, eventually falling past the point of no return. Because black holes have acquired so much mass, they have a very strong gravitational field. It's so strong that not even light can escape their grasp. This is why astronomers call them black holes. Astronomers still have so much more to learn about these bizarre objects, and as technology improves our knowledge will approve along with it.

Monday, October 3, 2011

Saturn's Rings and Enceladus

    We all know Saturn as the big outer planet with the rings. Why does Saturn have such beautiful ring structure? Astronomers aren't entirely sure, but they must have formed back when Saturn was just an infant planet. Astronomers can, however, explain the existence of Saturn's outermost ring, the E ring. Where did this ring come from? The culprit is Saturn's Moon Enceladus!
    Above is a recent image taken by the Cassini spacecraft which is currently orbiting Saturn and its moons. As you can see, there appears to be some material erupting from the surface of the moon, and indeed there is! Enceladus experiences what we call cryovolcanism, which means that it has volcanoes which spew water and ammonia when they erupt instead of hot rocky lava. These eruptions are so intense that the material actually leaves the planet and travels into outer space! Since Saturn's rings are so close to Enceladus, the water and other molecules get caught up in Saturn's gravitational field and form the outermost ring. This ring is technically unstable, which means the material will stay for a short time, but then be lost forever into space. That's no big deal though, because Enceladus is continually erupting and adding new material to the E ring.
    Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute

Thursday, September 29, 2011

Neutrinos Break the Speed Limit!

 It's by far the hottest news in physics and astronomy right now: neutrinos were found to move faster than the speed of light!

What are neutrinos and where do they come from?
Neutrinos are a subatomic particles. They are essentially the building blocks of atomic particles such as protons and neutrons which are inside atoms. Neutrinos come in different types (or flavors as particle physicists call it) and are often the result of nuclear reactions or radioactive decay of an atom. They are created in stars and supernova explosions, and we can also create them here on Earth using particle accelerator labs. Neutrinos are electrically neutral which means that they don't interact with things often and can therefore travel far distances and through thick objects without ever being bothered. As an example, the sun creates so many neutrinos that every square cm of our body is being hit with 65 billion neutrinos every second! That's right every second! And we never feel anything.

How do you measure the speed of neutrinos?
The first task at hand is to build a device that can detect neutrinos. It's very hard to stop a neutrino, but particle physicists have figured out a way to detect there presence. I'm not going to go into the details here, so you'll just have to take my word for it. The next task is measuring their speed, and that theory is simple. Velocity, or speed in a given direction, can be calculated by taking the distance traveled and dividing by the time it took to move that distance. It's the same concept as driving a car. The distance from point A to point B, divided by the time I took to get there, gives me my average traveling speed in miles per hour. Now imagine a very long underground vacuum tube like the one particle physicists have at CERN. Neutrinos are created at point A at a given time, travel down the tube, and are detected at point B some amount of time later. We know how long the tube is, and we know the departure and arrival time of the neutrinos, so we can calculate a speed!

Faster than light?
Assuming that neutrinos travel at the speed of light (which is the current theory), particle physicists knew how long it should take for the neutrinos to get form point A to point B. When they looked at the timestamps given by the computers, the neutrinos actually arrived at point B ~60 nanoseconds too early! (That's 0.000000060 seconds) This implies that they traveled faster than the speed of light! (By a very tiny amount, but still measurable). The team that conducted the experiment has been checking for any possible errors that they may have made, and have yet to find any.

If no mistakes were made, what does this mean?
Attempting to interpret this result has some pretty cool implications in the world of physics. What does it mean if a neutrino travels faster than the speed of light? Well it sort of means that the neutrino traveled backwards in time! Our sense of time is defined around the speed of light, so if something moves faster than light, it can be observed before it even occurs. Very weird to think about! Another option is that the neutrinos took "short cuts" through higher dimensions during their travels. In this sense, the neutrinos didn't travel faster than light, they just took a shorter path from point A to B that we as humans can not perceive. The final option is that certain parts of the theory of relativity are incorrect and objects can move faster than the speed of light, without traveling back in time or entering different dimensions. Which one of these solutions is right? Well we will have to wait for the next Einstein to come along and figure it out!

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

The Speed of Light


One of the first things you learn in physics or astronomy 101 is that the speed of light is a constant. We call it by the letter "c", and it's equal to 299,792,458 meters/second or 670,616,629 mph. According to the theory of relativity, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. Why? It's not something Einstein made up, it comes from the theory of physics. Light has properties of both particles and waves. It tends to travel like a wave (similar to a sound wave), but interacts like a particle (like two objects bumping into each other). The crucial piece to all of this is that light has no weight. It can interact with objects, and it has energy, but no weight. So what does this have to do with speed? Physics says that as you move faster, your mass (how "heavy" you are in a sense) increases. Now I don't mean speeding up from 0 to 60mph in a car, I mean traveling very close to the speed of light. The closer you get to c, the "heavier" you get. If a person were to travel at the speed of light, their mass would be infinity. This is why people, or other massive objects, can't travel at light speed. But since light waves/particles have no mass, they can travel at the speed of light no problem! Experiments show us that light has no mass, and travels a given speed "c". Therefore, any object with zero mass can travel at a maximum speed of c. And since objects can not have negative mass, there is no physical way for anything to travel faster than c. Or is there?.... Tune in later this week to learn about objects called neutrinos that may somehow have the ability to travel faster than the speed of light!